Check out all of the details of this month's Patch Notes, featuring the Reflections: Reforged update!
https://mabinogi.nexon.net/news/69963/reflections-reforged-patch-notes-november-4th-2021
[NEW MILLETIANS] Please note that all new forum users have to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours, and we appreciate your patience.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the Nexon Forums Code of Conduct. You have to register before you can post, so you can log in or create a forum name above to proceed. Thank you for your visit!

Accessory Slot For The Style Tab

Momma_SophieMomma_Sophie
Mabinogi Rep: 2,460
Posts: 285
Member
Would it be reasonable to ask for an accessory slot for the Style Tab? I see that players can only have 1 aesthetic accessory (such as a Halo or Support Puppet) equipped at a time in the Gear Tab; there's a Face Accessory slot in the Style Tab, so would it not be a nice idea to have that option to wear puppets and halos without consuming space in the Gear Tab?

I don't think this change would affect reforge sales too heavily, because people will still likely buy the pre-r1 aesthetic accessories or reforge aesthetic accessories to allow adornment of another aesthetic accessory (e.g. Halo in Gear Tab with Puppet in Style Tab). I believe there's a low amount of people who reforge aesthetic accessories, because many people intelligently decide to instead sacrifice things like Lucky Rabbit Foot to the RNG/repair gods when enchanting risky effects like "Haunted" or "Spooky."

I do think it would increase sales and use of general aesthetic accessories, because they right now seem more like gacha clutter since they clash with active player Gear Tab slots. Aesthetic accessories are released so often that it would be more reasonable to allow an accessory tab on the Style Tab that would fit these items, so that people can interchangeably wear more of them.

Thanks for reading.
-Sophiedela of Nao
  1. Aesthetic Accessory Slot For Style Tab?3 votes
    1. Sure
       100% (3 votes)
    2. Nah
       0% (0 votes)