«Better to teach the 'youth' to control their anger and jealousy, rather than their 'loving' activities.» -Writings of The (returned/retired) Messiah
«Children*» must not be «abused» (spanked hard, physically beaten, yelled at and beratd, etc) but it is a very common-place «problem» that plagues the world-populations (see Daniel Mackler's writings/videos on this very important but under-discussed world-tragedy). Near-everybody has experienced public-schools, and, has probably encountered the «school-bully» (or school-bullies since they also often come in groups/cliques). This «war-activity» (i.e. : abuse/bullying/etc) would become a non
-issue (world-wide) if everyone were taught from a young age (world-wide) to keep their negative-emotions under control rather than being taught/conditioned to suppress their positive-expressions (and, yes, the effect would also be seen in the adult-world).
I have plenty of experience with teaching, and, I can tell you for a fact, that, when someone behaves in a manner unruly/violent/abusive/etc., I have a much better and more effective approach for «correcting» their behaviour than those who go into immediate «punishment» mode, for example, one particular case-in-point : A teenager was constantly pestering/harassing/attacking a pre-teen student in a class I was once teaching, then, I had to take him aside and, explain to him, that he was being a bully, and, whilst he responded that he wasn't bullying him, I said he was being a bully, is that the kind of man he wants to be ? A bully ? Whilst not all of the details, that was the gist of an important part, then he became well-behaved, without me having to «punish» him (I later learned that his treatment of the other student was similar to that of which was inflicted upon him by his parents, then, I later on wrote to the parents to get them corrected, too; things have gone a lot better for his life since and he still has high-respect for me to this day).
Spoiler-Content : Appropriate Famous Song Related to Thread-Title/Content
Spoiler-Content : Why I am putting the word «Children» in Quotes
For the uninformed, the world «Child» (or Children) on «Legal» forms/documents places them in a «Ward of the State» status, meaning, basically, that the State owns them (you are no longer the real «parent» of the child; the state has ultimate-authority of the fate of said child), and, they can «Legally» do what-ever they want, including taking custody away from you. Whilst I am not a parent, I have come across numerous cases of Parents who «didn't know the law», and, end up losing custody of their children, some fight unsuccessfully to prevent the so-called «judges» from doing things like ordering «forced vaccinations» of their «children» (this age-group doesn't need them by the way) or other measures that result in forcing things upon these youth against their and/or their parents' wills, such as being placed into foster-homes, orders that result in family members literally NEVER being allowed to see each other again under the threat that they will all be jailed if they even attempt to contact one another, etc.
For the rest of the «plot» (involving «children») I will let the «military insiders» play out the rest of the «script» which should start being uncovered after the distraction over at the Eastern-European lands start getting less coverage in order to promote the idea that the world needs some sort of new financial-system (all controlled by the same banksters who caused all of these messes of course)...