[NEW MILLETIANS] Please note that all new forum users have to be approved before posting. This process can take up to 24 hours, and we appreciate your patience.
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the
Nexon Forums Code of Conduct. You have to register before you can post, so you can log in or create a forum name above to proceed. Thank you for your visit!
Substation power suppression [A Guide]
Хаhahaха nothing to see here !
Usually, the detectable magnetic field from a substation extends between 3 and 8 metres away. Some are stronger than others, and in rare, exceptional cases, EMF may extend to about 15 metres. Outside of the detectable magnetic field, there can be no health effect from the substation.
What went wrong?
A man waving burst into a classroom today and around the room, three , their teacher and a policeman before himself.
Thirteen other and another teacher were, five of them critically, and 57 who witnessed were with.
(The police identified the as 34-year-old
Karel Charva, a native of Prague, The Associated Press reported.)
''We have no idea what his motive was,'' a police spokesman said. ''The only witnesses are and they are either or in such an extreme state of shock that they cannot answer our questions.''
The man forced his way into the classroom on the second floor of the state school 10 miles west of Frankfurt in midmorning.
dated 03.06.1983
Comments
Even in the «spirit-world» the percentage of the population who participate in «romantic-relationships» is still only like 2-3%.
If your emotions are dependent upon what someone else is doing or not doing (or to be more border-line near-inappropriate-descriptive : whom someone else is doing or not doing) then you're already just setting yourself up for «problems» from the very beginning.
Also, know this, and that is the fact that there are more single people in the world than married people, more than half of the entire world is without some sort of so-called exclusive-partner (or any «partners» at all), than there are people with «partners» and it's been this way ever since around... well, hmm, probably around the time of or right before or right after the baby-boomer generation. Alas, the greater responsibility does fall upon the man, but, unfortunately, the world as it has been for a while is not exactly conducive for boys to develop into «real men» by the time they become so-called adults.
Men also need to be able to keep their emotions under control. If your «emotions» are dictated by what others do/say then you are simply not a man but are still in the stages of emotional-adolescence even if you are physically of adult-age. Anyway, before I end up writing a book after all, I am just going to end with saying that not everybody is/was meant to be in a «relationship» either (and for those of you who believe in astrology/horoscopes, and compatibility ratings, believe it or not, the results of any compatibility calculator are actually going to change and fluctuate from year-to-year, thus, ultimately, relationships require WORK/compromise/forgiveness/honesty/etc., to maintain and for both «partners» to essentially be on the same page...otherwise it is [probably] best to simply «friend-zone» each other from the beginning if you suspect yourself falling short of any of the elements of «relationship-material» status).
«fuel» to burn that «metaphorical-fire (emotional)» within you, almost like it's calculated and designed and intended to offend you with maximum effect, and the whole entire day (yours) ends up responding/interacting with all sorts of what be described as «mud-slinging» at each other.
Actually, I have had such a thing happen to me before on someone else's «popular» video, responding to my comment that was fairly well-received by most people, but some people in the world are «extremely argumentative» and this guy was trying to back and forth with me and he had nothing but «criticism» and an extremely arrogant attitude towards me to the point where he was trying to «make fun» of me personally rather than present any kind of valid logical-reasoning as to why I should re-consider whether what I considered to be «truth» should be revised/re-considered or not. Eventually, I was forced to essentially respond that, because I am aware of how others may be influenced in the way that I respond (to him), and for the sake of other people who might be reading the dialogue/exchange between me and him, although I do not remember the exact wording that I use, I basically responded along the lines that I could see that he was not «ready» to have a «civil-discourse» with me but that I would not berate him or project the kind of negativity that he was expressing, and as I choose to «lay down my verbal-mace» that there would be no need for us to engage in any further dialogue since it would be quite time-wasting, but, for the sake of his «soul» I did leave him with the link to The Testament of Truth so that he at least had an «opportunity» to «save himself» from «on-going eternal-misery» IF he chose to absorb its «wisdom» and become «wise» instead of his on-going «war-mongering» style mentality. The point of making reference to astrology was simply to point out that external sources of «expertise» are not «reliable» in the end. I don't care if it's a «doctor» or even some «peer-reviewed university so-called "scientist"» ...although George Carlin was saying that «this country (referring to America))» (and pretty much everyone in it, cops, teachers, parents, etc.) is «full of ****» that «full of ****» description actually applies to really most of the entire world... especially that of which is often called main-stream media (yes, all of them, throughout the entire world).
I didn't say to believe that your more or less compatible from one year to another. I was trying to convey that any «answers» you get from others or even external-sources about your «relationship» (such as astrology/horoscopes) are not «permanent» answers. I have actually studied the field of para-psychology fairly in-depth, and I can tell you that things like «predictions» and «premonitions» are not «set in stone» future-realities. YOU, especially when you learn what it means to be a man with leadership-capabilities, have the ability to literally «direct the future» as you please (albeit still subject to the Law of Karmic-Return). One time I even had a whole entire group of guys tell me one day that, whilst they were all sad, upset, depressed, etc., wallowing in their own pity because of apparent «women problems» they were all talking about me and how they were all wishing that they could be more [like] me (for some reason). Yeah... I was like... what the heck... Only to an extent (regarding similarities amongst females). Whether it is «fool-proof» or not may be a matter of opinion.
I will tell you this much... when men get older, they actually value the time that they can get/have to themselves, and often prefer it over «getting into a relationship» ...I suspect that a lot of «parents» do not actually provide the [type of] «love» for their sons/daughters where it actually counts (for nurturing into health men/women in the future), but, instead, have been hood-winked, duped, and suckered into a «materialist-paradigm» where-in they think that having the most-expensive gadgets, biggest cars, largest houses, etc., some-how equates to the same thing as «fulfillment» in life... sure, they are «nice» to have, but even «six-figure-income husbands» I learned about were still desperate to «stop their lover's divorce or rejection» and just in case anybody reading this thread may have missed what I had quoted from above... open the Spoiler this time as I re-quote it here... Anyway, similarly to how parents who grow up with a mind-set of materialism are failing to fulfill what their sons/daughters need the most, FALSELY believing that «buying expensive presents/toys» for their sons/daughters = love, I have also noticed a trend in this world that males are also falsely taught or influenced into believing that the more $$$ they spend on a girl/woman the more it means that the girl/woman will «love» him and/or «fall in love» within him over his «massive expression» of «showering» her with affection; that is not how «reality» works, and if that is how she was raised and taught by her «materialist» parents, and she believes in the same way as her parents do, then you may as well just lump her into the category of gold-digger (avoid at ALL costs). I pretty much have a basic rule that I have for women who want me to spend money on them... they will help me make that $$$ that they want to be spent (on them)... especially if it's for anything that I deem «expensive» (and I'm a really frugal cheap-skate). I would describe one of many the reasons why I can «remain by myself» for extremely long periods of time and not fall into «feelings of loneliness» but as I was starting to describe it I realised that it would require too many metaphors and most people of this world would actually be «skeptical» that such things could even exist so I'll just stop here for now (especially since I need to get ready for soon up-coming travel-appointment this morning).
I genuinely doubt you actually meant that seriously, particularly since you're going through a breakup with a garbage partner - which you have my genuine sympathies on, and I hope life will get better for you without their crap - but ouch, mate...don't let people make that comparison.
Everyone's a child to some degree, yeah some of us hang around to see what other's comment instead of fully leaving the argument. I've been guilty of that myself, but I've never actually continued a downward-spiraling conversation or debate, short of seeking that sense of 'closure' or satisfying that curiosity of what their last insult might have been. Habi also never said that it didn't mean you weren't "affected" or hurt by other's actions or comments. It was about how you handle it, that matters, man or woman.
Its the small difference, for example, between cussing out someone for being annoying, or ignoring them. Or, in an even simpler manner, not engaging at all with someone who wants to rile you up. No one was impressed with the prior political "debates", for instance, where both contestants were acting like children and insulting each other instead of actually debating the points. However, those who are calm and collected in the face of mud-slingers, insults and trolls are typically viewed more favorably than those screaming against them. Something I see a lot of in real debates.
I understand wanting to let the anger out. I feel it a lot myself, honestly, there are days when I am literally that meme of Scar shaking his head at the hyenas in a more 'fire and brimstone' manner. Its the difference, however, between being constructive about it and not. You want to get and feel better, from those people and things that hurt you. More often than not, that means just breathing out and trying to let the anger go with it.
I am sorry you had such a miserable experience. I hope things get better soon and you can find a real woman/partner instead of another user. Hang in there mate.
Can you feel, the love tonight?
Imagine waking up one morning and seeing THAT crowd at your doorstep-
Went through transition last week then?
Alright then-
Lol I'd just rather not be related to a 'Zeus' of any sort, nothing personal~
And goodness only knows. I've met 30 year olds who still behave like they're in middle school, and kids younger who act older so *shrugs* joys of people, but I ain't admitting to anything :P
You also typically don't want to take the hand of a woman in labor anyway, as she will very likely crush it.
I beg to differ, I've held so many conflicting titles its a work of living art XDD
Joys of being the Invoker of Chaos. Life is good, but a little hectic.
Dealing with those who devour is quite frankly the least of my concerns.
It was shooed under a rug, swept out the door, and then hidden in your sock drawer in a last ditch effort.
Why did this sound kinda passive aggressive?