KattheAzureDragon wrote: »Haruhime20 it astounds me that you failed to grasp what the situation really was. Merlin's whole intention at inviting to that tent was to mine you for information on the current state of affairs not to "bed" you. But clearly a topic like a secret order of knights that serve Aton Cimeni can't be talked about in Dunby square. Hence he used the romantic excuse to not raise any question from his peers or onlookers. He was teasing Treasure Hunter on this event he clearly wasn't going to say real reason as that would defeat the purpose of keeping it secret. He might have also enjoyed messing with Treasure Hunter that way as well as a form of revenge from the constant bullying.
Now as to why your idea of having them all get involved wouldn't work it is quite simple, none of the other Aces even know the Knights exist. Merlin is involved because he met Talvish in the past due to his bunny experiment and so he is actually involved in the plot. Having the others would be pointless as I am sure they have other things to do, and honestly the Knight Illuminati is probably a joke to them.
tl;dr You never had intimate relations with Merlin, and the decision to include him on the story was deliberate regardless of "looks."
So....if what I'm understanding is right, that person wants you to sell gold in return for getting $ on paypal to buy nx from the gold website. Therefore, he can buy the reforges himself, at a cheap price because that gold website offers such deals.
IMO, he's legit and not trying to scam you. He already explained several times why he wants paypal instead, and even offered to give tons of vouchers if needed.Foxgirlkatie wrote: »frankly to me her trying to reject a ingame trade and only do a paypal trade and then give me the gold makes me feel like shes trying to scam me. as anyone who genuinely cares about the other parties concerns would recognise it and do what they need to in order to ensure the other party feels safe during the transaction.
and what are your thoughts and impressions on this? do you think Paypal trades should be allowed or what? i wanted to hear your thoughts. and if you want what you think of the conversation.
However, trying to buy reforges and nx using such methods is another matter. Also, to answer your question, paypal trades are already not allowed according to the rules, so.
Blissfulkill wrote: »Kingofrunes wrote: »Blissfulkill wrote: »No, I actually loved Talvish and Altam here, but I am getting REAL tired of this "Balance is great'" or "Balance is needed" ideal. It sounds nice because of connotations, but it is akin the the "natural is better" fallacy; one is assuming a trait is inherently good in of itself, and arguing everything the trait encompasses as being better.
This is naive as it is pervasive belief I want laid to rest, because it is one of those things society often emphasizes as great, but neglects to inform us why, leading to a bunch of people accepting it without much thought, based on the glowing connotations we unfairly associate with this or that.
I disagree. In all the balance stories I've seen, there's been a force that counters that notion. However, I also follow the God of Balance in another game I play (Guthix). It's a problem if there's too much evil in the world, however, I don't think one can hope to truly eliminate evil. So the best one can do is to achieve balance in that regard. If one could eradicate evil that would be different.
Balance implies evil is necessary to perform and to exist. I disagree entirely. What you are discussing is what I said previously, but the notion we should not have too much of anything without its opposite is fallacious in nature, and is a case by case basis.
Should have is not the equivalent to would have.
I ask you this. Do individuals like Ted Bundy or Pol Pot need to exist, or would they invariably have existed anyway in some shape or form? This is a loaded question, but this emphasizes my point regarding how I perceive "balance". The logic would lead to consistent applications I find unsavory.
Would we have to save individuals of low moral principles if there is far too much good hearted people in the world? Do we have to kill those who are a blessing to this world in order to preserve balance?
I believe I am misunderstanding your viewpoint, but where lies the inherent good in balance, or rather, how do you define a "Good" balance?
Blissfulkill wrote: »Immortality is immunity to being killed, not biological immortality where natural means induced by age or illness fail to take effect, or nigh-invulnerability, where an entity is merely far more resilient.
Neamhain seemed to get pretty close to being killed by Nuadha.
Also what about Macha? I really did not understand the plot of hers fully, but we did actually defeat her at Saga I? She poofed into nothingness.
GTCvActium wrote: »When Talvish "ascends", he actually is at the very least on par with a 3rd tier god, or in the same rank as Morrighan. But before that he was able to repeal Cichol who is also a 3rd tier god so yeah, Altam went up against someone who could stand against a physical god. Yes, they explicitly stated that the Elder's body infused with unholy light would be stronger than Morrighan, and ascended Talvish is basically that.Third tier? What makes up the other two? I know Aton Cimeni would probably be Top tier, but who would be second?
Also, lol this thread is going to be a LOT of spoiler tags before we're done with it. XD